Clinical evaluation of common allergens in contact dermatitis to cement

Authors

  • K. Narashimman Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology Government Dharmapuri Medical College, Dharmapuri, Tamil Nadu
  • V. Gomathi Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology Government Dharmapuri Medical College, Dharmapuri, Tamil Nadu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4529.IntJResDermatol20181817

Keywords:

Contact Dermatitis, Cement exposure, Photo patch test, Eosinophilia

Abstract

Background: Cement is the most common cause of occupational dermatitis in construction industry. Skin contact with cement results in irritant contact dermatitis ranging from cement burns to chronic cumulative irritant contact dermatitis. Chromate, cobalt, nickel, epoxy resins and rubber chemicals are the important allergens in construction workers. The objective of the study was to study various clinical pattern of distribution and association between the duration of exposure to cement and clinical manifestation in occupational group.

Methods: 107 cases of contact dermatitis with history of exposure to cement attending the occupational contact dermatitis outpatient department, Department of Dermatology, Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital and college, All the patients were subjected to blood investigation such as complete hemogram, liver function test, renal function test and absolute eosinophil count. Patient with history and clinical features suggestive of contact dermatitis due to cement were patch tested.

Results: Among 107 patients, the most common pattern of involvement includes extremities which account for 64 patients (59.8%) Involvement of face, neck, trunk and extremities was seen in 11 patients (10.3%). Among 81 positive patch test patients, chromium was positive in 78 patients (96.3%) followed by epoxy resin in 14 patients 17.3% and cobalt and thiuram mix in 9 patients (11.1%) each and the least was black rubber mix in 3 patients (3.7%).

Conclusions: This study emphasizes the need for standardization in the chrome content of cement. Strict workplace safety guidelines should be implemented from government to protect workers from developing contact dermatitis to cement. 

Author Biography

K. Narashimman, Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology Government Dharmapuri Medical College, Dharmapuri, Tamil Nadu

assistant professor, department of physiology, annamalai university

References

Mitchell JC, Rook A. Botanical Dermatology: Plants Injurious to the Skin. Vancouver: Green grass; 1979: 1–25.

Rycroft RJG. Occupational diseases of the skin. In: Baxter PJ, Adams PH, Aw T-C,et al., eds. Hunter’s Diseases of Occupations, 9th edn. London: Arnold; 2000: 725–737.

Barratt MD. Quantitative structure–activity relationships for skin irritation and corrosivity of neutral and electrophilic organic chemicals. Toxicol Vitro. 1996;10:247–56.

Nangia A, Andersen PH, Berner B, Maibach HI. High dissociation constants (pKa) of basic permeants are associated with in vivo skin irritation in man. Contact Dermatitis. 1996;34:237–42.

Basketter DA, Holland G, York M. Corrosive materials. In: Chew A-L, Maibach HI, eds. Handbook of Irritant Dermatitis. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2006: 239–248.

Warren R, Ertel KD, Bartolo RG, Levine MJ, Bryant PB, Wong LF. The influence of hard water (calcium) and surfactants on irritant contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 1996;35:337–43.

English JS, Ratcliffe J, Williams HC. Irritancy of industrial hand cleansers tested by repeated open application on human skin. Contact Dermatitis. 1999;40:84–8.

White IR, Lewis J, El Alami A. Possible adverse reactions to an enzyme containing washing powder. Contact Dermatitis. 1985;13:175–9.

Goh CL. Cutting fluid dermatitis: epidemiology and an appraisal of some preventive measures. Environ Dermatol. 1994;1:3–11.

Henschel R, Agathos M, Breit R. Acute irritant contact dermatitis from propionic acid used in animal feed preservation. Contact Dermatitis. 1999;40:328.

Boman A. Factors influencing the percutaneous absorption of organic solvents: an experimental study in the guinea pig. Arbete Och Hälsa. 1989;11:1–51.

Bryant HE, Visser ND, Yoshida K. Ethylene oxide sterilizer use and short-term symptoms amongst workers. J Soc Occup Med. 1989;30:101–6.

Bruze M, Almgren G. Occupational dermatoses in workers exposed to resins based on phenol and formaldehyde. Contact Dermatitis. 1988;19:272–7.

Lovell C. Plants and the Skin. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1993.

Pruitt VM. Work-related burns. Clin Occup Environ Med. 2006;5(2):423-33.

Spoo J, Elsner P. Cement burns: a review 1960–2000. Contact Dermatitis. 2001;45:68–71.

Malten KE. Thoughts on irritant contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 1981;7:238–48.

Downloads

Published

2018-04-25

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles